Scientific Foundation
Research-Backed Methodology
Our GEO analysis framework is grounded in peer-reviewed academic research from leading institutions including Princeton University, MIT, and the Indian Institute of Technology.
Generative Engine Optimization Framework
Our analysis methodology implements the Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) framework introduced by Aggarwal et al. at the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.1 This pioneering research established the first systematic approach to measuring and optimizing content visibility in AI-powered search engines, demonstrating that strategic optimization can improve visibility by up to 40% across generative AI platforms.
The GEO paradigm addresses a fundamental shift in information discovery: while traditional search engine optimization (SEO) focuses on ranking algorithms, GEO optimizes for how large language models synthesize information from multiple sources to generate comprehensive responses.1
Six-Category Scoring Model
Our proprietary scoring algorithm evaluates visibility across six evidence-based dimensions (100-point scale per AI provider):
Brand Visibility
Direct mentions and brand association strength in AI responses
Market Competition
Competitive positioning relative to industry peers
Reputation Quality
Digital footprint strength and authoritative citations
Customer Sentiment
Reputation signals and satisfaction indicators
Share of Voice
Position-adjusted visibility using exponential decay methodology
Content Quality
The #1 ranking factor for GEO success1
Note: Each category is weighted based on research findings that identify the key factors driving generative engine visibility.
Enhanced Scoring Features
Our implementation incorporates several research-backed enhancements:
- •Position-Adjusted Share of Voice: Implements exponential decay based on mention position, reflecting the diminishing impact of lower-ranked mentions in AI responses.1
- •Citation Quality Weighting: High-authority sources (+5 points), medium-authority (+3), and low-authority (+1), recognizing that citation source credibility significantly impacts AI recommendation confidence.
- •Sentiment-Based Presence Fallback: When direct online presence signals are unavailable, the model intelligently infers presence quality from customer sentiment data.
- •Content Quality Integration: Integrated as a key scoring category, based on findings that content comprehensiveness and authority are the strongest predictors of generative engine visibility.1
Multi-Platform Generative Engine Analysis
Following the GEO-bench evaluation framework,1 our analysis queries multiple leading generative AI platforms to provide comprehensive visibility assessment:
- •OpenAI ChatGPT: The most widely adopted conversational AI, representing mainstream consumer search behavior
- •Google Gemini: Integrated with Google Search infrastructure, reaching users through Google's ecosystem
- •Perplexity AI: Specialized AI search engine with citation-focused architecture
Research indicates that different generative engines exhibit domain-specific optimization requirements,1 necessitating multi-platform analysis for comprehensive visibility assessment.
Known Limitations and Considerations
As with all AI-based systems, our analysis has inherent limitations:
- •Temporal Variability: Generative engine responses are dynamic and non-deterministic. Scores represent point-in-time snapshots and may vary 15-30% between analyses due to model updates, training data changes, and competitive landscape shifts.
- •Black-Box Nature: Following the GEO framework's black-box optimization approach,1 our methodology does not require access to proprietary model architectures or training data, but consequently cannot predict future algorithmic changes.
- •Domain Specificity: Optimization strategies show varying effectiveness across industries.1 Our analysis is specifically calibrated for the moving and logistics industry.